Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Sumitomo Touring LS V vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Sumitomo Touring LS V tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
49/100
Owner ratings
Dry
82
Wet
68
Snow
66
Comfort
69
Noise
65
Treadwear
78
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Sumitomo Touring LS V — better handling, treadwear and snow. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort and noise matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Touring LS V leads by 5
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
82
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Touring LS V leads by 1
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
68
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners – 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Touring LS V leads by 6
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
66
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 11
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
69
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 11
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
65
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Touring LS V leads by 7
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
78
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Touring LS V leads by 10
A — Sumitomo Touring LS V
83
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourceTouring LS VAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 73

Scores at a glance

Sumitomo Touring LS V vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo Touring LS VYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 73 71
Dry 82 77
Wet 68 67
Snow 66 60
Comfort 69 80
Noise 65 76
Treadwear 78 71
Handling 83 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sumitomo Touring LS V

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo Touring LS V B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo

Yokohama

Winner: Sumitomo Touring LS V — better handling, treadwear and snow. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 76 vs 65 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Sumitomo Touring LS V scores 83 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Sumitomo Touring LS V scores 78 vs 71 on treadwear.

Tire A · Sumitomo Touring LS V
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.