77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
46 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama Advan dB V552 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF1 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF1 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF1 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF1 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 66 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF1 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 84 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF1 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF1 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF1 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Proxes CF1 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 68 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF1 | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 70 |
| Dry | 85 | 72 |
| Wet | 80 | 66 |
| Comfort | 80 | 84 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling | 76 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Toyo Proxes CF1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range tire that excels in providing excellent dry and wet grip, comfort, and road feedback. While users frequently praise its performance and affordability, the consensus is that the tire utilizes a softer compound, leading to accelerated tread wear that may disappoint drivers seeking high mileage longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
- Not suitable for mud or snow conditions
Observations
- Users reported that the tire significantly improved the handling and comfort of smaller hatchbacks and older vehicles, such as the Yaris and classic Porsche 911.
- Van owners noted that the 'C' rated cargo version offers a quieter, more car-like handling experience, though it lacks traction in loose terrain.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines reported the fastest rates of tread wear.
The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
- Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
- Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
- Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires
Observations
- The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
- Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF1 | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Toyo
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama Advan dB V552 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 80 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 85 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 76 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire B · Yokohama Advan dB V552
More comparisons
Also compared with
Toyo Proxes CF1 also compared with
Yokohama Advan dB V552 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.