82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Toyo Proxes R39 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Toyo Proxes R39 — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if treadwear and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Proxes R39 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Proxes R39 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Proxes R39 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Proxes R39 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 89 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Proxes R39 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Proxes R39 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 72 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Proxes R39 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 35 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Proxes R39 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Proxes R39 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes R39 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 79 |
| Dry | 97 | 84 |
| Wet | 83 | 77 |
| Comfort | 80 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 35 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 86 |
| Handling | 83 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Toyo Proxes R39 receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between its strong dry-weather performance and significant concerns regarding longevity. While some drivers appreciate the tire's value and handling characteristics, others report premature tread wear that falls well below industry expectations.
Pros
- Excellent dry road handling and grip
- Competitive price-to-quality ratio
- Reliable performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear
- Poor overall durability and longevity
- Inconsistent lifespan expectations
Observations
- Owners of heavier, turbocharged AWD vehicles like the Mazda CX-5 have reported exceptionally short tread life, suggesting the tire may struggle with the torque and weight of modern crossovers.
The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
- Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
- Even and durable tread wear
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Observations
- SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
- Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes R39 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Toyo
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Toyo Proxes R39 — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if treadwear and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 80 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes R39 scores 97 vs 84 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 86 vs 73 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 91 vs 83 on handling.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes R39
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
More comparisons
Also compared with
Toyo Proxes R39 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.