39
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
39/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Sumitomo Tour+ LSW vs Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LSW | Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 52
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LSW | Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 38 | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LSW | Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 60
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LSW | Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 33 | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 47
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LSW | Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Sumitomo Tour+ LSW | Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 39 | 87 |
| Dry | 55 | 90 |
| Wet | 38 | 90 |
| Comfort | 35 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 33 | 93 |
| Handling | 40 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
39
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Sumitomo Tour+ LSW receives predominantly negative feedback, with a significant number of users reporting severe quality control issues. While a small minority of owners appreciate the ride comfort and wet weather performance, the consensus is heavily marred by persistent vibrations, balancing difficulties, and reports of structural defects.
Pros
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Competent performance in rain and snow for some users
- Cost-effective alternative to premium brands
Cons
- Severe and persistent vibration issues
- Difficulty maintaining wheel balance
- Reports of structural belt defects and blowouts
- Poor wet weather traction and handling
Observations
- Users driving performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Nissan 350Z, noted a significant decline in handling and refinement compared to premium tires like Michelin.
- Multiple reports of highway-speed instability suggest the tire may struggle with high-speed structural integrity.
The Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV is highly regarded by users for its exceptional tread longevity and reliable all-weather performance. Owners consistently report that the tire maintains strong grip across diverse conditions, including wet, dry, and winter environments, making it a dependable choice for high-mileage drivers.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong, consistent grip in wet and dry conditions
- Competent winter performance comparable to dedicated studless winter tires
- High confidence and stability at motorway speeds
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Minor reduction in grip during extreme winter conditions compared to fresh tires
Observations
- Users operating heavy 4WD vehicles report significantly higher mileage compared to original equipment tires.
- The tire maintains performance consistency even when the vehicle is fully loaded for long-distance travel.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Sumitomo Tour+ LSW | B · Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
39
/ 100
Sumitomo
87
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 93 vs 33 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 90 vs 38 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 87 vs 40 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 90 vs 55 on dry.
Tire A · Sumitomo Tour+ LSW
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Sumitomo Tour+ LSW also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.