81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
86/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
79/100
44 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Michelin CrossClimate+ and Vredestein Quatrac Pro are within 2 points overall. Michelin CrossClimate+ is stronger on snow, treadwear and dry. Vredestein Quatrac Pro is stronger on comfort and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 81 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 87 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 99% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 90% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Quatrac Pro leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 88 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 65 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 91% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 100% | 96% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 97% | 88% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Quatrac Pro leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 75 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Quatrac Pro leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 78 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 80 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 85 | 87 |
| Snow | 75 | 67 |
| Comfort | 81 | 89 |
| Noise | 76 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 78 |
| Handling | 73 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 78% #8/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 85% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | -7 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 93% #7/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test | +6.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 99% #7/10 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | -8.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 93% #5/11 · 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | 81% #6/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | +12.5 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 100% #2/2 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 VS Michelin CrossClimate+ | 100% #15/16 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 100% #4/7 · 2020 ADAC SUV All Season Tyre Test | 86% #14/16 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | +13.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 92% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 96% #7/10 · 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test | -4.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #9/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 88% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | +12.1 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 65% #3/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 84% #10/15 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | -18.8 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 100% #1/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 68% #10/16 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | +31.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/9 · 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 14% #7/9 · 2025 Auto Bild All Season Camper Van Tyre Test | -3.2 | Different tests |
| Rough Noise | Rough | 100% #9/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 98% #6/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | +1.8 | Same test |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 91% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 97% #8/9 · 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test | -6.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 100% #2/2 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 VS Michelin CrossClimate+ | 96% #7/10 · 2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | +3.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 97% #7/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test | 88% #6/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | +9.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #8/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test | 88% #8/9 · 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test | +6.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 90% #9/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 93% #6/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | -2.9 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 70% #13/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 92% #7/11 · 2024 TireRack All Season and Weather Tyre Test | -22.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 85% #5/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 63% #9/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | +22.5 | Same test |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #1/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 98% #2/11 · 2024 TireRack All Season and Weather Tyre Test | +1.8 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 94% #4/9 · 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test | -6.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 95% #3/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | +0.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
- Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.
Cons
- Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
- Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.
Observations
- Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
- Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance all-season tire that excels in ride comfort, noise suppression, and wet-weather handling. While most users praise its ability to bridge the gap between summer-like dry performance and winter safety, opinions on its longevity and deep-snow traction are polarized.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring dry handling
- Good performance in mild to moderate winter conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life and durability reports
- Potential for flat-spotting or vibrations after sitting
- Limited traction in deep snow or on steep inclines
- Occasional reports of significant drop in fuel economy
Observations
- Users with heavy SUVs and AWD vehicles report high satisfaction with wet/slush performance, though some note that deep snow traction is inferior to dedicated winter tires.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Fiesta ST, Porsche Cayenne) appreciate the steering feedback and dry handling, though some note a slight 'softness' in the shoulder during aggressive cornering.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate+ | B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Michelin
80
/ 100
Vredestein
Too close to call: Michelin CrossClimate+ and Vredestein Quatrac Pro are within 2 points overall. Michelin CrossClimate+ is stronger on snow, treadwear and dry. Vredestein Quatrac Pro is stronger on comfort and handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 67 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 86 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 89 vs 81 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate+ also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac Pro also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.