83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Vredestein Sportrac 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Sportrac 3 — better wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Sportrac 3 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Sportrac 3 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Sportrac 3 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Sportrac 3 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Sportrac 3 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Sportrac 3 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Sportrac 3 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Sportrac 3 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Sportrac 3 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 80 |
| Dry | 85 | 83 |
| Wet | 91 | 78 |
| Comfort | 79 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 75 |
| Handling | 80 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Sportrac 3 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in wet weather conditions, offering exceptional resistance to aquaplaning and strong, predictable grip. While many users praise its ability to transform vehicle handling and provide a sense of safety, opinions are polarized regarding road noise and tread longevity, with some users reporting rapid wear and increased noise levels as the tires age.
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Predictable and progressive grip characteristics
- Strong steering response and handling feedback
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
Cons
- Increased road noise, often described as a 'humming' or bearing-like sound
- Rapid tread wear reported by spirited drivers
- Soft sidewall construction which may feel unstable during aggressive cornering
- Performance degradation as tread depth approaches the legal limit
Observations
- Drivers of heavy diesel vehicles noted that the tire can struggle with traction during aggressive acceleration due to the weight over the front axle.
- Users with performance-oriented hatchbacks (e.g., Fabia vRS, Golf) frequently reported high satisfaction with handling but noted faster-than-average tread wear.
- Some owners of RWD vehicles expressed concerns regarding sidewall stiffness, noting a lack of confidence during high-speed cornering.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Sportrac 3 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Vredestein
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Vredestein Sportrac 3 — better wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Sportrac 3 scores 91 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 79 on comfort.
Tire A · Vredestein Sportrac 3
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein Sportrac 3 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.