Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta vs Yokohama A022 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Vredestein

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
77
Comfort
90
Treadwear
45
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama A022

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Yokohama A022 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
1 owner review
Dry
90
Wet
80
Comfort
90
Treadwear
100
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama A022 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A022 leads by 3
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
87
B — Yokohama A022
90
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaA022
Tyre Reviews owners 87 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A022 leads by 3
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
77
B — Yokohama A022
80
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaA022
Tyre Reviews owners 77 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
90
B — Yokohama A022
90
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaA022
Tyre Reviews owners 90 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A022 leads by 55
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
45
B — Yokohama A022
100
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaA022
Tyre Reviews owners 45 100

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A022 leads by 7
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
83
B — Yokohama A022
90
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaA022
Tyre Reviews owners 83 90

Scores at a glance

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta vs Yokohama A022: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Ultrac SUV SessantaYokohama A022
Relative Score 73 90
Dry 87 90
Wet 77 80
Comfort 90 90
Treadwear 45 100
Handling 83 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta

The Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta is generally regarded as a capable mid-range tire that offers strong dry-weather handling and impressive cabin quietness. While users appreciate the structural integrity of the sidewalls and cornering feedback, the tire's longevity and performance in cold conditions remain points of contention.

Pros

  • Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering feedback
  • High levels of cabin comfort and low noise
  • Robust sidewall construction compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short service life
  • Reduced traction in cold or freezing temperatures
  • Potential for uneven shoulder wear on specific vehicle geometries

Observations

  • Users driving vehicles prone to outer-edge wear, such as the BMW 5 Series, noted that the tire's tread depth design may exacerbate existing alignment-related wear patterns.
Tire B Yokohama A022

The Yokohama A022 is highly regarded by owners for its exceptional grip and handling characteristics, particularly in spirited driving scenarios. Users report impressive longevity and surprising versatility, noting reliable performance even in adverse weather conditions like snow and ice.

Pros

  • Exceptional cornering grip and traction under acceleration
  • Impressive tread life, with reports of over 34,000 miles
  • Surprising capability and reassurance in winter conditions
  • High level of driver confidence and feedback

Cons

  • Discontinued production status makes finding replacements difficult
  • Limited availability in the current market

Observations

  • Highly praised for its performance synergy with the Toyota MR2 platform
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta B · Yokohama A022
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama A022 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama A022 scores 100 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama A022 scores 90 vs 83 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama A022 scores 90 vs 87 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama A022 scores 80 vs 77 on wet.

Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
Tire B · Yokohama A022

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.