Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Vredestein

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
77
Comfort
90
Treadwear
45
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar SUV

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Geolandar SUV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
83
Comfort
67
Treadwear
77
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta if comfort and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ultrac SUV Sessanta leads by 4
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
87
B — Yokohama Geolandar SUV
83
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaGeolandar SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 87 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar SUV leads by 6
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
77
B — Yokohama Geolandar SUV
83
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaGeolandar SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 77 83

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ultrac SUV Sessanta leads by 23
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
90
B — Yokohama Geolandar SUV
67
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaGeolandar SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 90 67

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar SUV leads by 32
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
45
B — Yokohama Geolandar SUV
77
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaGeolandar SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 45 77

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
83
B — Yokohama Geolandar SUV
83
Why this score
SourceUltrac SUV SessantaGeolandar SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 83 83

Scores at a glance

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Ultrac SUV SessantaYokohama Geolandar SUV
Relative Score 73 79
Dry 87 83
Wet 77 83
Comfort 90 67
Treadwear 45 77
Handling 83 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta

The Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta is generally regarded as a capable mid-range tire that offers strong dry-weather handling and impressive cabin quietness. While users appreciate the structural integrity of the sidewalls and cornering feedback, the tire's longevity and performance in cold conditions remain points of contention.

Pros

  • Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering feedback
  • High levels of cabin comfort and low noise
  • Robust sidewall construction compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short service life
  • Reduced traction in cold or freezing temperatures
  • Potential for uneven shoulder wear on specific vehicle geometries

Observations

  • Users driving vehicles prone to outer-edge wear, such as the BMW 5 Series, noted that the tire's tread depth design may exacerbate existing alignment-related wear patterns.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar SUV

The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
  • Reliable dry handling performance

Cons

  • Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
  • Not suitable for high-performance driving
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain

Observations

  • Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
  • Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta if comfort and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 77 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta scores 90 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 83 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta scores 87 vs 83 on dry.

Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.