80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
70 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 and Yokohama Geolandar SUV are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 is stronger on comfort and dry. Yokohama Geolandar SUV is stronger on handling and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dueler H/T 684 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 684 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 684 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Dueler H/T 684 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 684 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 67 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 684 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 684 | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 83 | 83 |
| Snow | 75 | – |
| Comfort | 86 | 67 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 74 | 77 |
| Handling | 71 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 is widely regarded as a competent, comfort-oriented highway tire that excels in dry, paved conditions. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and factory-standard performance, it receives significant criticism for its limited tread life and poor traction in snow, ice, or off-road environments.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise on paved surfaces
- Strong dry-weather handling and stability
- Good value proposition as an OEM replacement
- Reliable performance for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Short tread life with many reports of premature wear
- Poor performance and lack of grip in winter conditions (snow and ice)
- Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall damage in off-road or gravel use
- Inconsistent wet-weather traction
Observations
- Users with heavy SUVs and trucks (e.g., Armada, Land Cruiser) report that the tire is not robust enough for gravel or flinty farm tracks, leading to frequent punctures.
- Owners of 2WD vehicles report a jittery and rough ride quality when driving on uneven or rough road surfaces.
- Some users noted that the tire is difficult to balance, requiring specialized equipment or multiple attempts to achieve a smooth ride.
The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
- Reliable dry handling performance
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Observations
- Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
- Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 and Yokohama Geolandar SUV are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 is stronger on comfort and dry. Yokohama Geolandar SUV is stronger on handling and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 scores 86 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 83 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 77 vs 74 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.