78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Yokohama Geolandar SUV are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on comfort and dry. Yokohama Geolandar SUV is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 67 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 83 | 83 |
| Snow | 81 | – |
| Comfort | 83 | 67 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 77 |
| Handling | 74 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
- Reliable dry handling performance
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Observations
- Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
- Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Yokohama Geolandar SUV are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on comfort and dry. Yokohama Geolandar SUV is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 77 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 83 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.