77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
75/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Falken FK510 SUV vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better comfort and treadwear. Pick the Falken FK510 SUV if dry and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
FK510 SUV leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | FK510 SUV | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 97 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
FK510 SUV leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | FK510 SUV | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | FK510 SUV | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 26 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 67 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | FK510 SUV | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | FK510 SUV | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | FK510 SUV | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK510 SUV | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 79 |
| Dry | 93 | 83 |
| Wet | 90 | 83 |
| Comfort | 48 | 67 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 77 |
| Handling | 82 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken FK510 SUV is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that delivers excellent dry handling, comfort, and noise suppression. While users consistently praise its competitive pricing and road manners, the consensus is divided regarding tread longevity, with several reports of premature wear on performance-oriented SUVs.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Superior dry handling and traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in spirited driving scenarios
Cons
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
- Soft sidewalls may lead to edge wear if pressures are not managed
Observations
- Performance-oriented SUVs like the Porsche Cayenne GTS and Mercedes C43 show significantly accelerated tread wear.
- Users report that the tire's soft sidewall construction enhances ride comfort but requires careful attention to alignment and tire pressure to prevent uneven edge wear.
The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
- Reliable dry handling performance
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Observations
- Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
- Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK510 SUV | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Falken
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better comfort and treadwear. Pick the Falken FK510 SUV if dry and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 67 vs 48 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken FK510 SUV scores 93 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 77 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken FK510 SUV scores 90 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken FK510 SUV also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.