90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar SUV if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 67 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar SUV leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 79 |
| Dry | 95 | 83 |
| Wet | 93 | 83 |
| Snow | 85 | – |
| Comfort | 89 | 67 |
| Noise | 88 | – |
| Treadwear | 90 | 77 |
| Handling | 80 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
90
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
The Yokohama Geolandar SUV is generally regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire suitable for daily commuting and light-duty use. While users praise its exceptional longevity and structural resilience against road hazards, its performance in wet conditions is frequently cited as a significant limitation.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
- Reliable dry handling performance
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Observations
- Subaru Outback owners noted a significant improvement in ride comfort compared to factory-fitted Yokohama tires.
- Land Rover Freelander 2 owners reported excellent durability and impact resistance on challenging road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
90
/ 100
Yokohama
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar SUV if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 89 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 77 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.