69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama A022 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama A022 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A022 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
A022 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
A022 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A022 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 100 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A022 leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Yokohama A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 90 |
| Dry | 84 | 90 |
| Wet | 64 | 80 |
| Snow | 92 | – |
| Comfort | 61 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 100 |
| Handling | 50 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Yokohama A022 is highly regarded by owners for its exceptional grip and handling characteristics, particularly in spirited driving scenarios. Users report impressive longevity and surprising versatility, noting reliable performance even in adverse weather conditions like snow and ice.
Pros
- Exceptional cornering grip and traction under acceleration
- Impressive tread life, with reports of over 34,000 miles
- Surprising capability and reassurance in winter conditions
- High level of driver confidence and feedback
Cons
- Discontinued production status makes finding replacements difficult
- Limited availability in the current market
Observations
- Highly praised for its performance synergy with the Toyota MR2 platform
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Yokohama A022 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich
90
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama A022 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A022 scores 90 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama A022 scores 90 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama A022 scores 100 vs 80 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama A022 scores 80 vs 64 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Yokohama A022
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Yokohama A022 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.