82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
77/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
116 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Michelin CrossClimate+ and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti are within 2 points overall. Michelin CrossClimate+ is stronger on comfort, dry and wet. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is stronger on handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 99% | 90% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 90% | 97% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 89% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 93% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 61 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 74 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Vorti leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 88 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 81 |
| Dry | 88 | 85 |
| Wet | 85 | 82 |
| Snow | 75 | – |
| Comfort | 81 | 71 |
| Noise | 76 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 83 |
| Handling | 73 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 78% #8/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 89% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | -11.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 90% #8/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | +9.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 97% #7/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | -7.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #7/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 73% #12/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | +13.4 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 92% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 97% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | -4.8 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #10/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 70% #4/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +30 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 65% #3/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 70% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -5 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 100% #1/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 72% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +28 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/9 · 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 50% #2/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test | -38.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #8/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test | 93% #7/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 90% #9/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -10 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 70% #13/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 60% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +10 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 60% #13/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 90% #4/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | -30 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #4/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0% #18/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 89% #6/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | +3.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
- Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.
Cons
- Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
- Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.
Observations
- Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
- Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that offers an exceptional balance of dry grip, steering feedback, and value. While the majority of users praise its ability to compete with premium brands like Michelin and Continental at a lower price point, a subset of users reports inconsistent wet-weather performance and concerns regarding long-term rubber degradation.
Pros
- Excellent dry handling and cornering stability
- High value-for-money compared to top-tier premium brands
- Aesthetically pleasing design with effective rim protection
- Strong road feedback and steering precision
- Generally low noise levels and good ride comfort
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Reports of premature cracking or dry rot in some batches
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle weight and driving style
- Occasional balancing issues reported by some users
Observations
- Users with 19-inch and larger wheels frequently noted a significant trade-off in ride comfort due to the stiff sidewall construction.
- Heavy vehicles (1.6+ tons) and high-torque setups generally report positive handling, though some note faster wear on the rear axle.
- Proper tire pressure management is critical for this model; several users noted that running the correct PSI is essential to prevent sidewall 'drag' and improve handling.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate+ | B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Michelin
81
/ 100
Vredestein
Too close to call: Michelin CrossClimate+ and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti are within 2 points overall. Michelin CrossClimate+ is stronger on comfort, dry and wet. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is stronger on handling.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 88 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 71 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 88 vs 85 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 85 vs 82 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate+ also compared with
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.