75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
77/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
116 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — better comfort, handling and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Vorti leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 94% | 90% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Vorti leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 89% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 93% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 78 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Vorti leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 40 | 61 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Vorti leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Vorti leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 88 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU1 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 81 |
| Dry | 78 | 85 |
| Wet | 81 | 82 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 56 | 71 |
| Noise | 87 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 83 |
| Handling | 75 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 90% #8/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | +3.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 99% #4/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test | -0.9 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 99% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 94% #8/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | +5.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 97% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +2.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 11% #9/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +8.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 92% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 93% #7/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | -0.4 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 40% #8/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -60 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 95% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 60% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +34.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 70% #8/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | +23.5 | Different tests |
| Tyre Weight | Tyre | 100% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #8/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 89% #6/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -2.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | +7.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that offers an exceptional balance of dry grip, steering feedback, and value. While the majority of users praise its ability to compete with premium brands like Michelin and Continental at a lower price point, a subset of users reports inconsistent wet-weather performance and concerns regarding long-term rubber degradation.
Pros
- Excellent dry handling and cornering stability
- High value-for-money compared to top-tier premium brands
- Aesthetically pleasing design with effective rim protection
- Strong road feedback and steering precision
- Generally low noise levels and good ride comfort
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Reports of premature cracking or dry rot in some batches
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle weight and driving style
- Occasional balancing issues reported by some users
Observations
- Users with 19-inch and larger wheels frequently noted a significant trade-off in ride comfort due to the stiff sidewall construction.
- Heavy vehicles (1.6+ tons) and high-torque setups generally report positive handling, though some note faster wear on the rear axle.
- Proper tire pressure management is critical for this model; several users noted that running the correct PSI is essential to prevent sidewall 'drag' and improve handling.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU1 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 58 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Nexen
81
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — better comfort, handling and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 71 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 87 vs 74 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 88 vs 75 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 83 vs 72 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.