86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
27 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Advan A050 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Sport | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 97 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Sport leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Sport | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 48 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Sport leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Sport | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Sport leads by 43
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Sport | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 35 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Advan A050 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Sport | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 92 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 61 |
| Dry | 92 | 97 |
| Wet | 88 | 48 |
| Comfort | 83 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 35 |
| Handling | 91 | 92 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
61
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire that delivers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium competitors. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and steering responsiveness, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and inconsistent feedback during spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium rivals
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Effective rim protection design
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback for some drivers
- Reports of premature wear or tread degradation under harsh conditions
- Occasional quality control issues such as high-speed vibrations
- Braking performance occasionally cited as inferior to top-tier performance tires
Observations
- Users fitting these to performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution) noted significant improvements in steering sharpness over stock tires.
- Drivers of family-oriented or ladder-frame SUVs reported a surprising increase in ride comfort despite the tire's UHP classification.
The Yokohama Advan A050 is widely regarded as a premier R-spec semi-slick tire, offering class-leading dry grip and exceptional handling feedback for time attack and track-focused enthusiasts. While users praise its consistent performance and predictable nature, they acknowledge that its high cost and rapid tread wear necessitate a dedicated use case, as it is not optimized for wet conditions or daily commuting.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
- Rapid warm-up time providing confidence from cold
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
- Compound-dependent performance variability
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on suspension tuning, as the extreme grip levels can overwhelm poorly set-up vehicles.
- Front-wheel drive users reported significantly faster wear on front tires compared to the rear, with an estimated lifespan of 5,000 km to 7,000 km.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Goodyear
61
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 78 vs 35 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 88 vs 48 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 83 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Advan A050 scores 97 vs 92 on dry.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport also compared with
Yokohama Advan A050 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.