Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 99 |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | 100 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 100 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 93% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 75 | 100 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 49 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | 100 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | 100 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 52 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | 100 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 96 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK510 | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 81 |
| Dry | 80 | 91 |
| Wet | 85 | 80 |
| Snow | – | 100 |
| Comfort | 62 | 78 |
| Noise | 84 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 58 |
| Handling | 81 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #2/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -88.9 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -20 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 98% #3/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 93% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +3.8 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
- Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
- Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
- Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
The Yokohama Advan A052 is widely regarded as a benchmark-setting 200 treadwear tire, prized for its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and surprising wet-weather capability. While it is a favorite for autocross and spirited street driving, users frequently note that its performance can degrade during extended track sessions due to heat soak, and its tread life is notably short compared to more durable competitors.
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
- Excellent road manners, including lower noise levels and better ride comfort than many rivals.
- Predictable breakaway characteristics that inspire driver confidence.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
- High price point relative to its limited longevity.
- Susceptibility to tread delamination or chunking under extreme track use.
Observations
- Lightweight vehicles like the Mazda Miata and Lotus Elise benefit most from the tire's characteristics, while heavier cars often experience accelerated wear and heat management issues.
- Users frequently report that the tires run 'wide' for their stated size, which can lead to fitment or rubbing issues if not accounted for.
- The tire is highly sensitive to alignment; vehicles without sufficient negative camber often suffer from rapid outside-edge wear.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Based on 25 community posts
Yokohama ADVAN A052
The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 68 | 21 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better comfort, noise and handling. Pick the Falken Azenis FK510 if treadwear and wet matter most to you.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 75 vs 58 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 78 vs 62 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 100 vs 84 on noise.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 96 vs 81 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.