62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama Advan A10 vs Yokohama ADVAN A11A — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN A11A — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A11A leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A11A leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A11A leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 45 | 75 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A11A leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A11A leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan A10 | Yokohama ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 86 |
| Dry | 84 | 90 |
| Wet | 66 | 75 |
| Comfort | 45 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 95 |
| Handling | 64 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Tire A
86
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan A10 is generally regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry weather conditions but suffers from significant longevity and durability issues. While users frequently praise its impressive dry grip and responsiveness, the consensus is marred by reports of rapid tread wear, premature sidewall cracking, and excessive road noise at highway speeds.
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
- High level of responsiveness and handling precision
- Strong performance in warm, dry climates
Cons
- Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
- High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
- Frequent reports of premature sidewall cracking
Observations
- Mitsubishi Lancer owners frequently report premature sidewall cracking and uneven front-end tread wear.
- Users noted that the tire's firm, performance-oriented compound can lead to a harsh ride quality that negatively impacts comfort on longer journeys.
- AWD vehicle owners reported mixed results, with some finding the grip sufficient while others noted significant traction loss in damp conditions.
The Yokohama Advan A11A is generally regarded as a capable, performance-oriented tire that offers predictable handling and strong dry-weather grip. While users appreciate its longevity and rigid sidewall feedback, there are notable concerns regarding long-term structural integrity and wet-weather braking performance.
Pros
- Confident dry-weather cornering and handling
- Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
- High durability and long tread life
- Good road feedback and rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Concerns regarding structural integrity, specifically sidewall splitting over time
- Mediocre performance and braking confidence on wet surfaces
- Firm ride quality that may be uncomfortable for some drivers
Observations
- The tire is noted for maintaining consistent performance characteristics over high mileage, with one user reporting successful use over 70,000 km.
- The tire's rigid sidewalls are specifically praised for providing clear road feedback, which some drivers find beneficial for spirited rear-wheel-drive applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan A10 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A11A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Yokohama
86
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A11A — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN A11A scores 95 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN A11A scores 95 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN A11A scores 75 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN A11A scores 75 vs 66 on wet.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan A10
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A11A
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama Advan A10 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN A11A also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.