62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama Advan A10 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 44
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 45 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Advan A10 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan A10 | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 90 |
| Dry | 84 | 95 |
| Wet | 66 | 93 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | 45 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 90 |
| Handling | 64 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan A10 is generally regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry weather conditions but suffers from significant longevity and durability issues. While users frequently praise its impressive dry grip and responsiveness, the consensus is marred by reports of rapid tread wear, premature sidewall cracking, and excessive road noise at highway speeds.
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
- High level of responsiveness and handling precision
- Strong performance in warm, dry climates
Cons
- Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
- High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
- Frequent reports of premature sidewall cracking
Observations
- Mitsubishi Lancer owners frequently report premature sidewall cracking and uneven front-end tread wear.
- Users noted that the tire's firm, performance-oriented compound can lead to a harsh ride quality that negatively impacts comfort on longer journeys.
- AWD vehicle owners reported mixed results, with some finding the grip sufficient while others noted significant traction loss in damp conditions.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan A10 | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Yokohama
90
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 89 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 80 vs 64 on handling.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan A10
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama Advan A10 also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.