67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE010 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
79 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE010 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD07 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE010 | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD07 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE010 | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD07 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE010 | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD07 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE010 | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 65 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE010 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE010 | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE010 | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 78 |
| Dry | 80 | 91 |
| Wet | 70 | 72 |
| Comfort | 60 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 75 |
| Handling | 85 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE010 is widely regarded as a specialized performance tire, particularly valued by enthusiasts for its role as the original equipment for the Honda Integra Type-R. While it offers predictable handling and strong dry-weather performance, users note that its longevity is limited and caution is advised when driving in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent handling characteristics and progressiveness
- Strong dry-weather grip and confidence
- Ideal for track use and maintaining vehicle authenticity
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Rapid tread wear rate
- Reduced traction in wet conditions
- Limited versatility compared to modern performance tires
Observations
- Highly recommended specifically for the DC2 Integra Type-R to maintain intended handling dynamics
- Performance is perceived as highly vehicle-specific rather than a general-purpose upgrade
The Yokohama Advan Neova AD07 is widely regarded as a high-performance, track-oriented tire that excels in dry grip, steering feedback, and predictability. While it is highly praised for its communicative nature and progressive breakaway characteristics, users note that it is an 'endurance' style 200TW tire rather than a 'super 200' compound, meaning it prioritizes longevity and consistency over absolute peak lap times.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and steering precision
- Highly predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
- Excellent durability and tread life for a track-capable tire
- Strong communication and feedback near the limit
Cons
- Can become 'greasy' or lose grip during extended, high-heat track sessions
- Higher road noise compared to standard summer tires
- Performance in wet conditions is adequate but requires caution
- Premium price point compared to some competitors
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars, such as the Lotus Elise, report that the tire significantly improves handling stability and reduces twitchiness compared to OE-spec alternatives.
- High-horsepower vehicles (500+ whp) generally find the tire effective for street traction, though some users note that it may not match the ultimate grip of dedicated 'super 200' tires on track.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE010 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Bridgestone
78
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE010 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 75 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 76 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 91 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza RE010 scores 85 vs 82 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE010
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE010 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.