78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Yokohama
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport AS leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport AS leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 73 |
| Dry | 87 | 77 |
| Wet | 83 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 67 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 71 |
| Handling | 84 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental SportContact 2 SSR is a polarizing run-flat tire that generally offers superior grip and comfort compared to older generation run-flat competitors like the Bridgestone Potenza. While many users appreciate its wet and dry performance, the tire's aging design is frequently criticized for uneven wear patterns, road noise, and a harsh ride quality on lower-profile fitments.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry traction performance
- Improved ride comfort compared to competing run-flat brands
- Respectable tread longevity for some users
- Reliable handling characteristics
Cons
- Tendency for uneven tread wear
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Harsh ride quality on low-profile, staggered setups
- Dated design compared to modern tire iterations
Observations
- Users with higher-profile 16-inch tires report significantly better ride comfort than those using low-profile, staggered setups on BMW 3-series models.
- Drivers of E90/E92 BMW chassis report mixed experiences, with some noting premature or uneven wear on both front and rear axles.
The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
- Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
- Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
- Potential for stability issues at highway speeds
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
- One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
- Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Continental
73
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 83 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 84 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 87 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat also compared with
Yokohama Advan Sport AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.