Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama Advan dB V552

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Advan dB V552 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
66
Snow
–
Comfort
84
Noise
–
Treadwear
65
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
81
Snow
80
Comfort
65
Noise
92
Treadwear
77
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan dB V552 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 5
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
72
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
77
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 68
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 72 90
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 15
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
66
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
81
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 80
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 66 81
SimpleTire owners – 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
–
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
80
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
SimpleTire owners – 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan dB V552 leads by 19
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
84
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
65
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 56
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 84 77
SimpleTire owners – 97

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
–
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
92
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 93
SimpleTire owners – 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 12
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
65
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
77
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
Tire Rack owners – 69
Tyre Reviews owners 65 76
SimpleTire owners – 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 15
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
68
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
83
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552ADVAN Sport V105
Tyre Reviews owners 68 83
DriverReviews owners 80 82

Scores at a glance

Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan dB V552Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Relative Score 70 77
Dry 72 77
Wet 66 81
Snow – 80
Comfort 84 65
Noise – 92
Treadwear 65 77
Handling 68 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama Advan dB V552

The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.

Pros

  • Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
  • Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
  • Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
  • Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
  • Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires

Observations

  • The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
  • Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
  • Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
  • Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
  • Predictable handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
  • Increased road noise reported by some users
  • Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
  • Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
  • Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
  • Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—10
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—240 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan dB V552 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 84 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 81 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 83 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 77 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan dB V552
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.