Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE030 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE030 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE030 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE030 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 60 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE030 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 64 |
| Dry | 81 | 79 |
| Wet | 58 | 70 |
| Comfort | 53 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 91 | 52 |
| Handling | 59 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE030 is widely regarded as a durable, long-lasting factory-fitted tire that excels in dry conditions but suffers from significant shortcomings in comfort and wet-weather performance. While owners appreciate the impressive tread life, the consensus points to excessive road noise and a lack of confidence-inspiring grip during rain as primary reasons for replacement.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
- Good steering feedback in dry conditions
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
- Harsh ride quality that can cause driver fatigue
Observations
- Users on compact vehicles like the Honda Jazz reported high mileage reaching 35,000-40,000 miles before reaching the 3mm wear mark.
- Drivers of heavier or more performance-oriented vehicles like the Lexus IS220d noted specific wear patterns, such as outer edge tearing and shoulder rounding on front tires.
The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent steering response and road feedback
- Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
- Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Yokohama
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE030 — better treadwear. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport if wet, handling and comfort matter most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 scores 91 vs 52 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport scores 70 vs 58 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport scores 65 vs 59 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport scores 57 vs 53 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.