Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE11 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE11 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE11 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE11 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 60 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE11 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 64 |
| Dry | 98 | 79 |
| Wet | 83 | 70 |
| Comfort | 74 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 52 |
| Handling | 89 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE11 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that delivers exceptional dry grip and confidence-inspiring handling. While it excels in aggressive cornering and spirited driving, users note that performance characteristics can vary based on vehicle weight and tire pressure, with some trade-offs in road noise and tread longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling and recovery when pushed to the limit
- Impressive wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Stiff sidewall construction providing precise steering feedback
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to standard touring tires
- Variable tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight
- Requires proper tire pressure tuning to avoid squirming under load
- Performance may require a warm-up period on lighter vehicles
Observations
- Heavier vehicles appear to benefit from the tire's construction, providing immediate grip, whereas lighter vehicles like the Subaru WRX may require more time to reach optimal operating temperatures.
- Users report that fine-tuning tire pressure (specifically lower PSI settings) is critical to preventing a 'squirming' sensation during high-load cornering.
The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent steering response and road feedback
- Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
- Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Yokohama
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 52 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 89 vs 65 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 98 vs 79 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 74 vs 57 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.