75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama AVID ENVigor vs Yokohama BluEarth AE01 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
22 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | AVID ENVigor | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 79 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | AVID ENVigor | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | AVID ENVigor | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | AVID ENVigor | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 75 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | AVID ENVigor | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | AVID ENVigor | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID ENVigor | Yokohama BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 70 |
| Dry | 84 | 79 |
| Wet | 81 | 73 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | 75 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 59 |
| Handling | 70 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama AVID ENVigor is generally regarded as a capable grand touring tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering drivers a sense of security and responsiveness. While users appreciate its performance characteristics and lateral grip, some report concerns regarding road noise levels and ride stiffness compared to other premium alternatives.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip
- Excellent lateral stability and handling feel
- Reliable performance at highway speeds
- Good value as a grand touring option
Cons
- Higher road noise levels than some competitors
- Ride quality can feel firm or harsh on certain vehicles
- Mixed feedback regarding long-term tread life expectations
Observations
- Drivers of sport-oriented sedans like the Civic Si noted the tire provides excellent handling but can feel stiff during spirited driving.
- Users replacing OEM tires on mid-size sedans like the Mazda6 reported significant improvements in lateral feel and wet weather confidence.
The Yokohama BluEarth AE01 is generally regarded as a high-performing eco-tire that excels in wet and dry grip, ride comfort, and fuel efficiency. While many users praise its safety and handling characteristics, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear compared to other brands.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- High level of ride comfort and handling
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Inconsistent and often rapid tread wear
- Reports of increased road noise as the tire ages
- Longer braking distances on dry surfaces noted by some users
- Vibration issues reported by a minority of drivers
Observations
- Users of small hatchbacks and city cars report significant improvements in wet-weather confidence and handling.
- High-mileage drivers, such as those using small vans, report favorable longevity when strict maintenance schedules are followed.
- Owners of premium compact vehicles (e.g., Mercedes A-Class) have reported disappointment regarding tread life compared to previous OEM fitments.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID ENVigor | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Yokohama
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 69 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 81 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 84 vs 79 on dry.
Tire A · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth AE01
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama AVID ENVigor also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.