70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama BluEarth AE01 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
22 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Yokohama Advan dB V552 and Yokohama BluEarth AE01 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Advan dB V552 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth AE01 is stronger on dry and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 79 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 75 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 68 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan dB V552 | Yokohama BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 70 |
| Dry | 72 | 79 |
| Wet | 66 | 73 |
| Comfort | 84 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 59 |
| Handling | 68 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
- Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
- Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
- Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires
Observations
- The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
- Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
The Yokohama BluEarth AE01 is generally regarded as a high-performing eco-tire that excels in wet and dry grip, ride comfort, and fuel efficiency. While many users praise its safety and handling characteristics, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear compared to other brands.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- High level of ride comfort and handling
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Inconsistent and often rapid tread wear
- Reports of increased road noise as the tire ages
- Longer braking distances on dry surfaces noted by some users
- Vibration issues reported by a minority of drivers
Observations
- Users of small hatchbacks and city cars report significant improvements in wet-weather confidence and handling.
- High-mileage drivers, such as those using small vans, report favorable longevity when strict maintenance schedules are followed.
- Owners of premium compact vehicles (e.g., Mercedes A-Class) have reported disappointment regarding tread life compared to previous OEM fitments.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Yokohama
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Yokohama Advan dB V552 and Yokohama BluEarth AE01 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Advan dB V552 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth AE01 is stronger on dry and wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 84 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 scores 79 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 scores 73 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 65 vs 59 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan dB V552
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth AE01
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama Advan dB V552 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.