70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
22 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
57
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
49/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth AE01 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE01 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE01 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 42
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE01 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 33 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Bluearth E51 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE01 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth AE01 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE01 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 45 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth AE01 | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 57 |
| Dry | 79 | 68 |
| Wet | 73 | 50 |
| Comfort | 75 | 33 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 80 |
| Handling | 68 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
57
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama BluEarth AE01 is generally regarded as a high-performing eco-tire that excels in wet and dry grip, ride comfort, and fuel efficiency. While many users praise its safety and handling characteristics, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear compared to other brands.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- High level of ride comfort and handling
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Inconsistent and often rapid tread wear
- Reports of increased road noise as the tire ages
- Longer braking distances on dry surfaces noted by some users
- Vibration issues reported by a minority of drivers
Observations
- Users of small hatchbacks and city cars report significant improvements in wet-weather confidence and handling.
- High-mileage drivers, such as those using small vans, report favorable longevity when strict maintenance schedules are followed.
- Owners of premium compact vehicles (e.g., Mercedes A-Class) have reported disappointment regarding tread life compared to previous OEM fitments.
The Yokohama BluEarth E51 receives a mixed to negative reception from users, primarily due to its performance as an OEM-fitted tire on luxury vehicles like the Lexus NX300h. While some owners appreciate its longevity and tread wear, many report significant issues with cabin noise, ride harshness, and inconsistent wet-weather traction.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Lack of refinement for luxury vehicle applications
Observations
- Lexus NX300h owners frequently report that the tire's stiff sidewalls and high noise levels detract from the vehicle's intended luxury experience.
- Users noted that the tire's performance limitations become apparent during rapid direction changes, highlighting its unsuitability for spirited driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth AE01 | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Yokohama
57
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth AE01 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 scores 75 vs 33 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 scores 73 vs 50 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 scores 68 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Bluearth E51 scores 80 vs 59 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth AE01
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth AE01 also compared with
Yokohama Bluearth E51 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.