68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
36 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE50 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE50 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE50 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE50 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE50 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth AE50 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 80 |
| Dry | 74 | 83 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Comfort | 71 | 86 |
| Noise | 72 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 75 |
| Handling | 69 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama BluEarth AE50 presents a polarizing experience for drivers, with user feedback sharply divided between those praising its comfort and wet-weather confidence and those frustrated by rapid tread wear and inconsistent noise levels. While many value it as a cost-effective, daily-driving tire, others report significant dissatisfaction regarding its longevity and performance degradation over time.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
- Noticeable fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
- Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, with some users reporting aquaplaning
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or FWD configurations frequently reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks noted that while the tire offers good daily comfort, it lacks the structural rigidity required for aggressive cornering.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Yokohama
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 71 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 74 on dry.
Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.