Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Premium Touring tires Updated September 2026

Yokohama BluEarth AE50 review

The Yokohama BluEarth AE50 presents a polarizing experience for drivers, with user feedback sharply divided between those praising its comfort and wet-weather confidence and those frustrated by rapid tread wear and inconsistent noise levels. While many value it as a cost-effective, daily-driving tire, others report significant dissatisfaction regarding its longevity and performance degradation over time.

Relative score
69/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
66/100
36 reviews
Road tests
70/100
3 published tests
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

66%
Would buy again 56%
Dry
Overall dry
74%
Corner stability
72%
Dry traction
76%
Steering response
72%
Wet
Overall wet
67%
Wet traction
72%
Comfort
Overall comfort
68%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
60%
Handling
Overall handling
69%

By road tests

70.1%
Dry
74.6%
Wet
75.9%
Comfort
72.4%
Noise
71.9%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
27.5%
Dry Handling
65%
Subj. Dry Handling
65%
Wet Braking
57.5%
Subj. Wet Handling
40%
Wet Handling
52.5%
Straight Aquaplaning
27.5%
Inside Noise level
85%
Subjective Comfort
85%
Rolling Resistance
85%
Price
37.5%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 36 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Yokohama BluEarth AE50 presents a polarizing experience for drivers, with user feedback sharply divided between those praising its comfort and wet-weather confidence and those frustrated by rapid tread wear and inconsistent noise levels. While many value it as a cost-effective, daily-driving tire, others report significant dissatisfaction regarding its longevity and performance degradation over time.

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
  • High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
  • Good value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Noticeable fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, with some users reporting aquaplaning

Worth knowing

  • Users with heavier vehicles or FWD configurations frequently reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks noted that while the tire offers good daily comfort, it lacks the structural rigidity required for aggressive cornering.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2020 Auto Zeitung Summer tire Test · 225/50 R17

11th of 20
Best: Rolling Resistance · 3rd Weakest: Dry Braking · 18th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking12th of 20
Wet Handling14th of 20
Dry Braking18th of 20
Dry Handling6th of 20
Rolling Resistance3rd of 20
Straight Aqua16th of 20
Subj. Dry Handling8th of 20
Subj. Comfort6th of 20
Subj. Wet Handling13th of 20
Noise8th of 20
Price16th of 20

2019 Auto Zeitung Summer tire Test · 235/45 R18

6th of 10
Best: Rolling Resistance · 3rd Weakest: Straight Aqua · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking4th of 10
Wet Handling4th of 10
Dry Braking7th of 10
Dry Handling6th of 10
Rolling Resistance3rd of 10
Straight Aqua8th of 10
Noise4th of 10
Price6th of 10

2018 AutoBild Summer tire Overview · 195/65 R15

22nd of 47
DisciplinePlacementField position
Head-to-head

Yokohama BluEarth AE50 compared

Compare any two