45
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Sumitomo Tour+ LST vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LST | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LST | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LST | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LST | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 61
Why this score
| Source | Tour+ LST | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Sumitomo Tour+ LST | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 45 | 80 |
| Dry | 65 | 83 |
| Wet | 50 | 78 |
| Comfort | 50 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 40 | 75 |
| Handling | 20 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
45
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Sumitomo Tour+ LST is perceived as a budget-oriented tire that prioritizes longevity over performance. While it offers improved tread durability compared to premium touring alternatives, users report a noticeable compromise in handling and overall grip.
Pros
- Improved tread wear longevity
- Cost-effective replacement option
Cons
- Significant reduction in grip compared to premium touring tires
- Compromised handling performance during spirited driving
Observations
- Users who prioritize tread life over cornering performance may find the trade-off acceptable for daily commuting.
- The tire is noted to perform poorly for drivers who engage in aggressive cornering.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Sumitomo Tour+ LST | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
45
/ 100
Sumitomo
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 20 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 78 vs 50 on wet.
Tire A · Sumitomo Tour+ LST
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Sumitomo Tour+ LST also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.