80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama dB super E spec — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
67/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 55 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 66 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 66 |
| Dry | 83 | 72 |
| Wet | 78 | 55 |
| Comfort | 86 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 66 |
| Handling | 81 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
The Yokohama dB super E spec is widely praised for its exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels, making it a popular choice for drivers prioritizing a refined cabin experience. However, user experiences regarding tread longevity are polarized, with significant reports of premature wear contrasting with isolated instances of high mileage durability.
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Reliable dry weather grip
- Smooth handling characteristics for daily commuting
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of rapid wear
- Poor performance in snow and slushy conditions
- Average wet weather traction compared to premium competitors
- Susceptibility to punctures or structural failure in some instances
Observations
- Users with lightweight, modestly powered vehicles like the Suzuki Swift reported excellent tread longevity, suggesting the tire performs best under lower-stress applications.
- Drivers of compact hatchbacks like the Toyota Yaris and Honda Civic noted significant improvements in cabin quietness and suspension compliance compared to OEM alternatives.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Yokohama
66
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 78 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 66 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Tire B · Yokohama dB super E spec
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
Yokohama dB super E spec also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.