Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama dB super E spec — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama Advan dB V552

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Advan dB V552 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
66
Comfort
84
Treadwear
65
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama dB super E spec

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama dB super E spec tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
67/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
55
Comfort
80
Treadwear
66
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Advan dB V552 — better wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
72
B — Yokohama dB super E spec
72
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552dB super E spec
Tyre Reviews owners 72 72

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan dB V552 leads by 11
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
66
B — Yokohama dB super E spec
55
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552dB super E spec
Tyre Reviews owners 66 55

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan dB V552 leads by 4
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
84
B — Yokohama dB super E spec
80
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552dB super E spec
Tyre Reviews owners 84 80

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) dB super E spec leads by 1
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
65
B — Yokohama dB super E spec
66
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552dB super E spec
Tyre Reviews owners 65 66

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Advan dB V552
68
B — Yokohama dB super E spec
68
Why this score
SourceAdvan dB V552dB super E spec
Tyre Reviews owners 68 68
DriverReviews owners 80 –

Scores at a glance

Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama dB super E spec: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan dB V552Yokohama dB super E spec
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 72 72
Wet 66 55
Comfort 84 80
Treadwear 65 66
Handling 68 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama Advan dB V552

The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.

Pros

  • Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
  • Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
  • Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
  • Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
  • Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires

Observations

  • The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
  • Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
Tire B Yokohama dB super E spec

The Yokohama dB super E spec is widely praised for its exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels, making it a popular choice for drivers prioritizing a refined cabin experience. However, user experiences regarding tread longevity are polarized, with significant reports of premature wear contrasting with isolated instances of high mileage durability.

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Reliable dry weather grip
  • Smooth handling characteristics for daily commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with reports of rapid wear
  • Poor performance in snow and slushy conditions
  • Average wet weather traction compared to premium competitors
  • Susceptibility to punctures or structural failure in some instances

Observations

  • Users with lightweight, modestly powered vehicles like the Suzuki Swift reported excellent tread longevity, suggesting the tire performs best under lower-stress applications.
  • Drivers of compact hatchbacks like the Toyota Yaris and Honda Civic noted significant improvements in cabin quietness and suspension compliance compared to OEM alternatives.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 B · Yokohama dB super E spec
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Advan dB V552 — better wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 66 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 84 vs 80 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan dB V552
Tire B · Yokohama dB super E spec

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.