Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G900 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
73/100
38 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
67
Snow
81
Comfort
72
Noise
100
Treadwear
84
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G900

Winter Touring tires

Yokohama Geolandar G900 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
14 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
82
Snow
70
Comfort
70
Noise
–
Treadwear
72
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 and Yokohama Geolandar G900 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 is stronger on treadwear, snow and handling. Yokohama Geolandar G900 is stronger on wet and dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G900 leads by 6
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
82
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
88
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 88

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar G900 leads by 15
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
67
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
82
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Professional tests (TWG score) 68 –
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 82

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 11
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
81
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
70
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Professional tests (TWG score) 80 –
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 81 70

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
72
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
70
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 70

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
100
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
–
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 12
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
84
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
72
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Tire Rack owners 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 84 72

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 3
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
72
B — Yokohama Geolandar G900
69
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Geolandar G900
Tyre Reviews owners 72 69

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G900: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2Yokohama Geolandar G900
Relative Score 76 76
Dry 82 88
Wet 67 82
Snow 81 70
Comfort 72 70
Noise 100 –
Treadwear 84 72
Handling 72 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
  • Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
  • Long tread life and high mileage capability
  • Aggressive, iconic visual appeal

Cons

  • Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
  • Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
  • Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow

Observations

  • Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
  • Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G900

The Yokohama Geolandar G900 is widely regarded as a highly capable, versatile all-rounder specifically engineered for Subaru Forester and Outback platforms. While users consistently praise its predictable handling, off-road traction, and comfort, the consensus is sharply divided regarding its tread longevity and value proposition compared to modern alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent all-terrain versatility including snow, gravel, and mud
  • Predictable and secure handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort compared to stiffer premium alternatives
  • Strong initial grip and traction performance

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with many reports of premature wear
  • High road noise levels, particularly on motorways
  • High price point relative to current market competitors
  • Occasional reports of poor wet-weather performance and aquaplaning

Observations

  • The tire is specifically optimized for the Subaru Forester and Outback chassis, with many users noting it complements the vehicle's suspension better than stiffer premium tires.
  • Performance is highly dependent on alignment; several users noted that uneven wear patterns were mitigated by professional tracking checks.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresWinter Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available16—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth13 - 15/32″—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Yokohama

Too close to call: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 and Yokohama Geolandar G900 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 is stronger on treadwear, snow and handling. Yokohama Geolandar G900 is stronger on wet and dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar G900 scores 82 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 scores 84 vs 72 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 scores 81 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar G900 scores 88 vs 82 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G900

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.