Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91FV — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar G91FV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
Owner ratings
Dry
87
Wet
83
Snow
74
Comfort
81
Noise
80
Treadwear
77
Handling
86

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow, comfort and noise. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G91FV if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91FV leads by 5
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
87
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 83
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 9
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
83
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 92 73
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 20
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
74
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 90
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 13
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
81
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 90 68
Tyre Reviews owners 97 –
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 13
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
80
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 12
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
77
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 91 79
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91FV leads by 1
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
86
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Geolandar G91FV
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91FV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
Relative Score 90 81
Dry 82 87
Wet 92 83
Snow 94 74
Comfort 94 81
Noise 93 80
Treadwear 89 77
Handling 85 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G91FV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow, comfort and noise. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G91FV if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 74 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 81 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 93 vs 80 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 77 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91FV

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.