Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
125 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
76
Snow
80
Comfort
79
Noise
80
Treadwear
74
Handling
78
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
55/100
Owner ratings
Dry
85
Wet
77
Snow
70
Comfort
76
Noise
70
Treadwear
78
Handling
83
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 and Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 is stronger on snow, noise and comfort. Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A is stronger on handling and treadwear.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 1
A
84
B
85
Why this score
SourceVentus V12 evo K110Geolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 84 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 1
A
76
B
77
Why this score
SourceVentus V12 evo K110Geolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners – 76
Tyre Reviews owners 75 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo K110 leads by 10
A
80
B
70
Why this score
SourceVentus V12 evo K110Geolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners – 85

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo K110 leads by 3
A
79
B
76
Why this score
SourceVentus V12 evo K110Geolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 79 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo K110 leads by 10
A
80
B
70

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 4
A
74
B
78
Why this score
SourceVentus V12 evo K110Geolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners – 75
Tyre Reviews owners 74 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 5
A
78
B
83
Why this score
SourceVentus V12 evo K110Geolandar H/T G95A
Tyre Reviews owners 78 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo K110Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
Relative Score 78 77
Dry 84 85
Wet 76 77
Snow 80 70
Comfort 79 76
Noise 80 70
Treadwear 74 78
Handling 78 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

The Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers excellent dry grip and predictable handling at a competitive price point. While many users praise its comfort and responsiveness, a significant portion of the user base notes that its soft sidewalls can lead to a 'wobbly' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering, and wet-weather performance is frequently described as inconsistent.

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry-weather grip and traction
  • Comfortable and relatively quiet ride quality
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • Good aesthetic appeal

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls causing instability or 'tread squirm' under load
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning susceptibility
  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by many users
  • Increased road noise as the tire wears down
  • Potential for vibration issues requiring precise balancing

Observations

  • Users with heavy front-wheel-drive vehicles or high-torque setups often reported faster tread wear and occasional traction loss.
  • Drivers of vehicles with stiff suspension (e.g., sports sedans) frequently noted that the soft sidewalls negatively impacted steering feedback and precision.
  • Some owners of larger, wider tire sizes reported increased 'skittishness' in standing water compared to narrower fitments.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Too close to call: Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 and Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 is stronger on snow, noise and comfort. Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A is stronger on handling and treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 scores 80 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 scores 80 vs 70 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A scores 83 vs 78 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A scores 78 vs 74 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.