78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
30 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S — better treadwear, noise and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
GEOLANDAR H/T S leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
GEOLANDAR H/T S leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
GEOLANDAR H/T S leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 55 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
GEOLANDAR H/T S leads by 12
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
GEOLANDAR H/T S leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
GEOLANDAR H/T S leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 87 |
| Dry | 88 | 96 |
| Wet | 83 | 92 |
| Snow | 81 | 75 |
| Comfort | 83 | 91 |
| Noise | 80 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 83 |
| Handling | 74 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S is generally regarded as a reliable, smooth-riding highway tire that excels in comfort and noise reduction for SUVs and light trucks. While many users praise its longevity and dry-road handling, experiences regarding tread life and winter traction are polarized, with some users reporting premature wear and subpar performance in snow.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong dry pavement traction and handling
- High value proposition with competitive pricing
- Consistent performance for daily commuting and light towing
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some reports of premature wear
- Mediocre performance in snow and icy conditions for some users
- Occasional reports of excessive road noise or 'growling' sounds
- Mixed feedback on wet weather grip
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners report mixed results, with some praising snow-plowing capabilities while others note rapid tread wear under heavy towing loads.
- SUV owners, particularly those with Jeep and Toyota models, frequently highlight a significant improvement in ride quality and noise levels compared to previous tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
87
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S — better treadwear, noise and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S scores 83 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S scores 92 vs 80 on noise.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S scores 92 vs 83 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S scores 96 vs 88 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Yokohama GEOLANDAR H/T S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.