Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 90 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 90 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 87 |
| Dry | 82 | – |
| Wet | 67 | 90 |
| Snow | 81 | 90 |
| Comfort | 72 | 80 |
| Noise | 100 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | – |
| Handling | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
- Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
- Long tread life and high mileage capability
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
- Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
- Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
- Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
The Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 is regarded as a competent winter tire that offers reliable performance in snow and ice, though it falls slightly short of the elite-tier winter tire segment. While it provides a noticeable improvement in traction compared to all-terrain alternatives, users note that lateral grip can feel somewhat limited during more demanding winter maneuvers.
Pros
- Superior snow and ice traction compared to standard all-terrain tires
- Reliable performance for off-road winter driving
- Consistent grip in challenging cold-weather conditions
Cons
- Lacking lateral grip on snow and ice
- Performance is outclassed by top-end dedicated winter tires
- Not considered a class-leading option for extreme winter conditions
Observations
- Users specifically utilizing the tire for off-road winter applications report it as a functional upgrade over aggressive all-terrain tires like the Hankook Dynapro AT M.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | — |
| Sizes available | 16 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 14/32″ |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 — better wet, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 scores 90 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 scores 90 vs 81 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 scores 80 vs 72 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.