Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV vs Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
Owner ratings
Dry
87
Wet
83
Snow
74
Comfort
81
Noise
80
Treadwear
77
Handling
86

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
67/100
1 owner review
Dry
–
Wet
90
Snow
90
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
–
Handling
–

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 — better snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
87
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
–
Why this score
SourceGeolandar G91FVGeolandar I/T G072
Tire Rack owners 83 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar I/T G072 leads by 7
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
83
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
90
Why this score
SourceGeolandar G91FVGeolandar I/T G072
Tire Rack owners 73 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar I/T G072 leads by 16
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
74
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
90
Why this score
SourceGeolandar G91FVGeolandar I/T G072
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 90

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91FV leads by 1
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
81
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
80
Why this score
SourceGeolandar G91FVGeolandar I/T G072
Tire Rack owners 68 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
80
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
77
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
–
Why this score
SourceGeolandar G91FVGeolandar I/T G072
Tire Rack owners 79 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
86
B — Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
–

Scores at a glance

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV vs Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Geolandar G91FVYokohama Geolandar I/T G072
Relative Score 80 87
Dry 87 –
Wet 83 90
Snow 74 90
Comfort 81 80
Noise 80 –
Treadwear 77 –
Handling 86 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama Geolandar G91FV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072

The Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 is regarded as a competent winter tire that offers reliable performance in snow and ice, though it falls slightly short of the elite-tier winter tire segment. While it provides a noticeable improvement in traction compared to all-terrain alternatives, users note that lateral grip can feel somewhat limited during more demanding winter maneuvers.

Pros

  • Superior snow and ice traction compared to standard all-terrain tires
  • Reliable performance for off-road winter driving
  • Consistent grip in challenging cold-weather conditions

Cons

  • Lacking lateral grip on snow and ice
  • Performance is outclassed by top-end dedicated winter tires
  • Not considered a class-leading option for extreme winter conditions

Observations

  • Users specifically utilizing the tire for off-road winter applications report it as a functional upgrade over aggressive all-terrain tires like the Hankook Dynapro AT M.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar G91FV B · Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072
Tread depth—14/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 — better snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 scores 90 vs 74 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 scores 90 vs 83 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.