Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 93 | 87 |
| Dry | 82 | – |
| Wet | 92 | 90 |
| Snow | 94 | 90 |
| Comfort | 94 | 80 |
| Noise | 93 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | – |
| Handling | 85 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 is regarded as a competent winter tire that offers reliable performance in snow and ice, though it falls slightly short of the elite-tier winter tire segment. While it provides a noticeable improvement in traction compared to all-terrain alternatives, users note that lateral grip can feel somewhat limited during more demanding winter maneuvers.
Pros
- Superior snow and ice traction compared to standard all-terrain tires
- Reliable performance for off-road winter driving
- Consistent grip in challenging cold-weather conditions
Cons
- Lacking lateral grip on snow and ice
- Performance is outclassed by top-end dedicated winter tires
- Not considered a class-leading option for extreme winter conditions
Observations
- Users specifically utilizing the tire for off-road winter applications report it as a functional upgrade over aggressive all-terrain tires like the Hankook Dynapro AT M.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Yokohama Geolandar I/T G072 |
|---|---|---|
| Sizes available | 40 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Yokohama
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 80 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 90 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.