Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 vs Yokohama W.Drive — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55

Winter Premium Touring tires

Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
85
Snow
90
Comfort
60
Noise
–
Treadwear
85
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama W.Drive

High Performance Winter tire

Yokohama W.Drive tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
14 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
75
Snow
62
Comfort
77
Noise
81
Treadwear
78
Handling
71

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama W.Drive if comfort and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) W.Drive leads by 9
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
80
B — Yokohama W.Drive
89
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Professional tests (TWG score) – 98
Tyre Reviews owners 80 77

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) IceGUARD Stud iG55 leads by 10
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
85
B — Yokohama W.Drive
75
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Professional tests (TWG score) – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 85 71

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) IceGUARD Stud iG55 leads by 28
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
90
B — Yokohama W.Drive
62
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Professional tests (TWG score) – 67
Tyre Reviews owners 90 55

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) W.Drive leads by 17
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
60
B — Yokohama W.Drive
77
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 60 77

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
–
B — Yokohama W.Drive
81
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Professional tests (TWG score) – 81

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) IceGUARD Stud iG55 leads by 7
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
85
B — Yokohama W.Drive
78
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 85 78

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) IceGUARD Stud iG55 leads by 4
A — Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
75
B — Yokohama W.Drive
71
Why this score
SourceIceGUARD Stud iG55W.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 75 71

Scores at a glance

Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 vs Yokohama W.Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55Yokohama W.Drive
Relative Score 80 76
Dry 80 89
Wet 85 75
Snow 90 62
Comfort 60 77
Noise – 81
Treadwear 85 78
Handling 75 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55

The Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 is highly regarded for its robust performance in severe winter conditions, offering reliable traction on snow, ice, and slush. While users praise its winter capabilities, they note that the tire's soft compound and stud configuration result in increased road noise and reduced handling precision on dry pavement.

Pros

  • Excellent grip and traction on snow and ice
  • Strong performance in slushy conditions
  • Durable tread life over multiple seasons
  • Effective stud retention during normal driving

Cons

  • High levels of road noise on dry or wet tarmac
  • Increased stopping distances on dry surfaces
  • Noticeable tire flex or 'tilting' during spirited cornering
  • Potential for stud loss under heavy driving conditions

Observations

  • Users report that the tire's performance is particularly enhanced when paired with 4x4 drivetrain systems.
  • The soft compound is noted to be more noticeable during city driving and maneuvers over uneven surfaces like tram tracks.
Tire B Yokohama W.Drive

The Yokohama W Drive presents a polarizing user experience, with performance heavily dependent on vehicle drivetrain and driving style. While many owners report excellent traction in snow and ice, providing a transformative winter driving experience, a significant subset of users—particularly those with high-torque rear-wheel-drive vehicles—report severe handling instability and safety concerns.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and mobility in snow and ice conditions.
  • Strong dry-road handling performance, often described as comparable to summer tires.
  • Impressive tread longevity when maintained at proper inflation pressures.
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for most users.

Cons

  • Significant instability and lack of rear-end grip reported on high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles.
  • Inconsistent performance on greasy or wet road surfaces.
  • Reports of excessive road noise and harsh ride quality from some users.
  • High sensitivity to tire pressure, leading to rapid wear if not monitored.

Observations

  • Users of high-torque BMW models (535d, 335d) reported severe traction issues and fishtailing, suggesting a potential mismatch between the tire's compound and high-torque RWD platforms.
  • Quattro (AWD) users reported high satisfaction, noting the tires provided reliable grip and durability across varied conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 B · Yokohama W.Drive
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresHigh Performance Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama W.Drive if comfort and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 scores 90 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama W.Drive scores 77 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 scores 85 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama W.Drive scores 89 vs 80 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55
Tire B · Yokohama W.Drive

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.