Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 vs Yokohama W.Drive — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 98 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 71 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 55 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 77 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 78 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | IceGUARD Stud iG55 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 | Yokohama W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 76 |
| Dry | 80 | 89 |
| Wet | 85 | 75 |
| Snow | 90 | 62 |
| Comfort | 60 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 81 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 78 |
| Handling | 75 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 is highly regarded for its robust performance in severe winter conditions, offering reliable traction on snow, ice, and slush. While users praise its winter capabilities, they note that the tire's soft compound and stud configuration result in increased road noise and reduced handling precision on dry pavement.
Pros
- Excellent grip and traction on snow and ice
- Strong performance in slushy conditions
- Durable tread life over multiple seasons
- Effective stud retention during normal driving
Cons
- High levels of road noise on dry or wet tarmac
- Increased stopping distances on dry surfaces
- Noticeable tire flex or 'tilting' during spirited cornering
- Potential for stud loss under heavy driving conditions
Observations
- Users report that the tire's performance is particularly enhanced when paired with 4x4 drivetrain systems.
- The soft compound is noted to be more noticeable during city driving and maneuvers over uneven surfaces like tram tracks.
The Yokohama W Drive presents a polarizing user experience, with performance heavily dependent on vehicle drivetrain and driving style. While many owners report excellent traction in snow and ice, providing a transformative winter driving experience, a significant subset of users—particularly those with high-torque rear-wheel-drive vehicles—report severe handling instability and safety concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and mobility in snow and ice conditions.
- Strong dry-road handling performance, often described as comparable to summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity when maintained at proper inflation pressures.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for most users.
Cons
- Significant instability and lack of rear-end grip reported on high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles.
- Inconsistent performance on greasy or wet road surfaces.
- Reports of excessive road noise and harsh ride quality from some users.
- High sensitivity to tire pressure, leading to rapid wear if not monitored.
Observations
- Users of high-torque BMW models (535d, 335d) reported severe traction issues and fishtailing, suggesting a potential mismatch between the tire's compound and high-torque RWD platforms.
- Quattro (AWD) users reported high satisfaction, noting the tires provided reliable grip and durability across varied conditions.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 | B · Yokohama W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama W.Drive if comfort and dry matter most to you.
Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 scores 90 vs 62 on snow.
Yokohama W.Drive scores 77 vs 60 on comfort.
Yokohama IceGUARD Stud iG55 scores 85 vs 75 on wet.
Yokohama W.Drive scores 89 vs 80 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.