Skip to content
All-season tire All Season Premium Touring tires Updated September 2026

General Grabber A/TX review

The General Grabber A/Tx is widely regarded as a high-performing, cost-effective alternative to premium all-terrain tires like the BFGoodrich KO2. Users consistently praise its exceptional traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions, as well as its surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride on pavement.

Relative score
82/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
91/100
253 reviews
Road tests
67/100
2 published tests
Community sentiment Positive Read the buzz
#Standard Load Weight Benefits#Snow and Winter Traction#Size Availability#Fuel Economy Conservation#Comparisons to Competitors

Owners rate it 24.7 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

General Grabber A/TX
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

91.2%
Would buy again 78%
Dry
Overall dry
94.9%
Corner stability
85%
Dry traction
87.5%
Steering response
80%
Wet
Overall wet
91.2%
Hydroplaning resistance
90%
Wet traction
95.5%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
85.8%
Light snow
92%
Heavy snow
92%
Ice
80.5%
Comfort
Overall comfort
88.3%
Ride comfort
88%
Noise
Overall noise
86.1%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
88.9%
Handling
Overall handling
90.4%
Off-road
Overall off-road
91%
Dirt
94%
Sand
90%
Mud
88%
Rock
92%
By source
America's Tire92%315 reviews Tyre Reviews72%5 reviews Tire Rack85%

By road tests

66.5%
Dry
71.6%
Wet
74.4%
Snow
59.3%
Comfort
66.9%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 253 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The General Grabber A/Tx is widely regarded as a high-performing, cost-effective alternative to premium all-terrain tires like the BFGoodrich KO2. Users consistently praise its exceptional traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions, as well as its surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride on pavement. While most owners report excellent durability, a minority of users have experienced faster-than-expected tread wear and noted that the aggressive tread pattern can pick up and throw small rocks.

Pros

  • Outstanding winter and wet weather traction
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium competitors
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort for an all-terrain tire
  • Rugged, aggressive aesthetic with effective rim protection
  • Strong off-road capability in mud, gravel, and deep snow

Cons

  • Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing small rocks
  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy for many users
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Occasional reports of 'tread squirm' or handling instability, particularly when new or under-inflated

Worth knowing

  • Heavy-duty truck owners (2500/3500 series) generally report high satisfaction with towing stability and load-bearing performance when using Load Range E tires.
  • Users with larger, wider tire sizes (e.g., 305/12.5R17) occasionally reported highway wandering or tracking issues, suggesting sensitivity to alignment and tire pressure in wider footprints.
  • Some SUV and light truck owners noted a significant drop in fuel economy, likely due to the tire's weight and aggressive compound.
Test results

2 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter tires on Snow · 265/70 R17

4th of 5
Best: Snow Braking · 3rd Weakest: Ice Braking · 5th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Snow Braking3rd of 5
Snow Traction3rd of 5
Snow Handling4th of 5
Ice Braking5th of 5
Subj. Comfort4th of 5
Subj. Noise4th of 5
Subj. Snow Handling4th of 5

What's the best type of tire for your SUV or Pickup truck? HT, AT and MT compared and tested · 265/70 R17

3rd of 4
Best: Dirt Handling · 1st Weakest: Wet Braking · 4th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking4th of 4
Wet Handling3rd of 4
Dry Braking4th of 4
Dry Handling3rd of 4
Rolling Resistance3rd of 4
Straight Aqua4th of 4
Subj. Dry Handling3rd of 4
Subj. Comfort3rd of 4
Subj. Wet Handling3rd of 4
Dirt Handling1st of 4
Gravel Handling2nd of 4
Subj. Dirt Handling1st of 4
Tyre Weight2nd of 4
Subj. Gravel Handling2nd of 4
Mud Performance2nd of 4
Where to buy

General Grabber A/TX specs & sizes

Specifications
Tread depth14 - 17/32″
UTQG640 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi

We don't have the size list for this tire yet. Search the retailer for your size:

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Community buzz

What owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.

Community members frequently praise the General Grabber A/TX for offering a lightweight, standard (SL) or lower load range option in larger sizes like 33" (275/70R18), avoiding the heavy weight and harsh ride of E-rated alternatives. Drivers appreciate their aggressive tread, good snow traction, and ability to help conserve fuel economy compared to heavier tires. They are often compared favorably against competitors like the BFGoodrich KO2, Falken Wildpeak, and Nitto Terra Grappler.

Head-to-head

General Grabber A/TX compared

Compare any two