Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Avon Ranger A/T vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 83 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 87 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 86 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 64 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 88 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ranger A/T | Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Ranger A/T | Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 85 |
| Dry | 90 | 83 |
| Wet | 95 | 88 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 80 | 83 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 95 | 88 |
| Handling | 85 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon Ranger A/T is highly regarded by users for its robust off-road capabilities and reliable performance across diverse weather conditions. Owners consistently praise its durability and traction, positioning it as a dependable alternative to premium all-terrain tire brands.
Pros
- Excellent off-road traction and grip
- Strong performance in snow and adverse weather
- High durability and expected long tread life
- Reliable handling across varied road surfaces, from motorways to country lanes
Cons
- Limited availability compared to major premium brands
- Subjective 'chunky' aesthetic may not suit all vehicle styles
Observations
- Users report successful performance on compact and mid-size SUVs, specifically the Land Rover Freelander and Subaru Forester.
- The tire is noted for maintaining consistent grip levels even when transitioning between high-speed motorways and rougher, single-track rural roads.
The Vredestein Quatrac is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-season tire that excels in wet and cold conditions. Most users report impressive longevity and consistent performance across varied climates, positioning it as a strong, cost-effective alternative to premium competitors like Michelin.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Strong longevity and tread life, often exceeding 60,000 km
- Reliable performance in cold and light-to-moderate snow conditions
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Occasional reports of sidewall cracking or premature aging
- Some users report high noise levels in specific vehicle/size combinations
- Can feel softer or less precise than dedicated summer tires in high-heat conditions
- Isolated quality control issues, such as manufacturing bulges
Observations
- Users on smaller city cars (e.g., Opel Karl) reported higher cabin noise levels compared to those on larger SUVs or sedans.
- Drivers of heavy vehicles (e.g., GLC350) noted that the tires maintain composure and silence despite the vehicle's weight.
- Feedback sensitivity is noted to be lower on smaller, high-profile tire sizes (e.g., 215/65 R16) compared to lower-profile performance fitments.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Avon Ranger A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Vredestein Quatrac
Community opinion on the Vredestein Quatrac (including Pro and Pro+ variants) is largely positive, with drivers praising their superior comfort, lower road noise, and strong wet-weather performance compared to stock or competing options. Many view them as a more affordable, smoother-riding alternative to premium alternatives like the Michelin CrossClimate 2, though a few users note mixed experiences regarding snow traction and occasional reports of premature shoulder wear.
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus Decided to try these out on my F60, so far so good. They are much better than the Pirelli run flats that were on. Ride is smoother, quieter, and better traction on wet pavement, and absorb the bumps a lot better. Also wanted to show what the Cravenspeed Gemini phone holder looks like. Super easy to install.”
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+s are excellent These tires are phenomenal. I have them on my 2019 Mazda3 and replaced my last set of Continental DWSs. Those were great tires, but I wanted something a bit better for the winter on this replacement, and I was hoping for something a bit quieter for road trips as well. I went with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ and these are *noticeably* quieter than the DWSs, and they ride better as well. I'm a huge fan so far. Read more”
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro Tire Review Bought these tires for my Mazda 3 after one of my OEM Bridgestone EL440’s got pregnant(sidewall bulge), and I plugged a puncture in the other one. Decided to just replace the tires completely. So far I’m happy with them. Pros: Severe snow rating so they are legally snow tires in my state(for mountain passes and stuff), and I’m guessing the snow traction is way better. They are still all season tires though. Seems to be a softer ride overall even on the stock 18” side. XL sidewall strength, vs the stock tires being standard. Should help with those sidewall issues. They seem fairly quiet as far as noise. $150 rebate in addition to being fairly cheap Cons: These are definitely not for those people who want sporty handling, they don’t really feel like a sport tire, and are more of a touring road tire. I’ve heard the treadwear isn’t the best(makes sense with the snow rating)”
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ shoulders ‘chunking up’ already Earlier this year (around February) I got a brand new full set of Quatrac Pro+ tyres for my BMW 325i. Since then the car has done around 3,500 miles. I’ve just had all the wheels off whilst doing some work on the car and the front tyres are chunking up on both shoulders, the rears are fine. (Pictures of front right attached, but they both look like this). It’s a RWD car, the pressures are as per factory, the car isn’t driven hard at all, the tracking is fine, I’m in the UK (so no extreme temperatures). Surely this can’t be right? Read more”
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Ranger A/T | B · Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon
Vredestein
Winner: Avon Ranger A/T — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac if comfort matters most to you.
Avon Ranger A/T scores 90 vs 83 on dry.
Avon Ranger A/T scores 95 vs 88 on wet.
Avon Ranger A/T scores 95 vs 88 on treadwear.
Avon Ranger A/T scores 85 vs 81 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.