68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
69/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
70/100
142 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Avon ZV7 vs Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
51
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
50/100
22 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Avon ZV7 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ZV7 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ZV7 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ZV7 leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | ZV7 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 35 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ZV7 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | ZV7 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 57 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ZV7 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ZV7 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ZV7 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 56 | 52 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ZV7 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | ZV7 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 54 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon ZV7 | Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 51 |
| Dry | 75 | 68 |
| Wet | 70 | 35 |
| Comfort | 77 | 57 |
| Noise | 50 | – |
| Treadwear | 56 | 52 |
| Handling | 71 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Tire A
51
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon ZV7 is a polarizing mid-range tire that receives high praise for its initial wet and dry grip, quiet ride, and value-for-money proposition. However, a significant number of users report severe, premature structural issues, specifically cracking within the tread grooves, which often necessitates replacement long before the tread depth is exhausted.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction when new
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- High value-for-money compared to premium brands
- Strong performance as a daily touring tire
Cons
- Widespread reports of premature tread cracking and perishing
- Inconsistent and often rapid tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback
- Difficult and unhelpful manufacturer warranty/claims process
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., Ford S-Max, Volvo V70, Mondeo) frequently report faster, uneven center-tread wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or modified vehicles often find the sidewalls too soft, resulting in a lack of precision during spirited driving.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles generally report higher satisfaction with longevity and comfort compared to those with larger, heavier saloons.
The Riken Maystorm 2 B2 is widely regarded by users as a budget-tier tire that offers acceptable performance in dry conditions but presents significant safety concerns in wet weather. The consensus among reviewers is that the tire suffers from rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and unpredictable handling, leading many to label it a false economy despite its low initial purchase price.
Pros
- Low initial purchase price
- Adequate grip and handling on dry pavement
- Generally quiet operation
Cons
- Dangerous lack of traction in wet or damp conditions
- Extremely rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Poor braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and lack of driver confidence
Observations
- Users driving heavier vehicles, such as the Citroen DS5, reported accelerated tread wear and poor performance compared to expectations.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Toyota Aygo and Yaris noted a 'floaty' or unstable feeling at highway speeds.
- Owners of electric vehicles, such as the Renault Zoe, reported that the tire's lack of grip was particularly hazardous given the vehicle's torque characteristics.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon ZV7 | B · Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Avon
51
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Avon ZV7 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Avon ZV7 scores 70 vs 35 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Avon ZV7 scores 77 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Avon ZV7 scores 71 vs 54 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Avon ZV7 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · Avon ZV7
Tire B · Riken Maystorm 2 B 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon ZV7 also compared with
Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.