67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Nexen Eurowin 650 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen Eurowin 650 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Nexen Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 80 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 80 |
| Snow | 20 | – |
| Comfort | 50 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 75 |
| Handling | 57 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Nexen Eurowin 650 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that delivers reliable performance in demanding alpine conditions. Users consistently praise its impressive grip on ice and heavy snow, noting that it provides a secure driving experience at an accessible price point.
Pros
- Excellent traction and control on ice and heavy snow
- High value-for-money proposition
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Consistent performance in severe winter environments
Cons
- Limited feedback regarding dry road handling characteristics
- Brand perception may not match premium tier competitors despite performance
Observations
- Proven reliability across multiple vehicle types, including compact luxury models like the Mercedes-Benz A-Class
- Demonstrated capability in extreme alpine winter conditions over multi-year usage
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Nexen Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
BFGoodrich
75
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen Eurowin 650 — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen Eurowin 650 scores 70 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen Eurowin 650 scores 80 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen Eurowin 650 scores 65 vs 57 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Nexen Eurowin 650
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Nexen Eurowin 650 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.