Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force R1 vs Continental ProContact GX SSR — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force R1

Trackday and Competition Summer tire

BFGoodrich g-Force R1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
1 owner review
Dry
100
Wet
30
Snow
–
Comfort
30
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
100

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
VerdictWinner: Continental ProContact GX SSR — better wet and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force R1 if treadwear, handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force R1 leads by 12
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
100
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
88
Why this score
Sourceg-Force R1ProContact GX SSR
Tire Rack owners – 92
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ProContact GX SSR leads by 53
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
30
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
83
Why this score
Sourceg-Force R1ProContact GX SSR
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 30 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
–
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
68
Why this score
Sourceg-Force R1ProContact GX SSR
Tire Rack owners – 77

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ProContact GX SSR leads by 44
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
30
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
74
Why this score
Sourceg-Force R1ProContact GX SSR
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 30 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
–
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
74

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force R1 leads by 27
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
80
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
53
Why this score
Sourceg-Force R1ProContact GX SSR
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force R1 leads by 13
A — BFGoodrich g-Force R1
100
B — Continental ProContact GX SSR
87
Why this score
Sourceg-Force R1ProContact GX SSR
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force R1 vs Continental ProContact GX SSR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force R1Continental ProContact GX SSR
Relative Score 65 75
Dry 100 88
Wet 30 83
Snow – 68
Comfort 30 74
Noise – 74
Treadwear 80 53
Handling 100 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force R1

The BFGoodrich g-Force R1 is highly regarded by track enthusiasts as a significant performance upgrade over competitors like the Nitto NT-01. Users report exceptional confidence and stability, noting a substantial reduction in understeer and improved grip during high-speed cornering and braking.

Pros

  • Superior cornering stability and reduced understeer
  • High levels of mechanical grip during braking and cornering
  • Predictable and gradual breakaway characteristics
  • Significant performance improvement over comparable R-compound tires

Cons

  • Susceptible to overheating when pushed at extreme limits (9+/10 intensity)
  • Limited longevity typical of dedicated track-focused rubber

Observations

  • Users transitioning from other R-compound tires report a noticeable increase in confidence and stability on track-focused setups.
Tire B Continental ProContact GX SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force R1 B · Continental ProContact GX SSR
CategoryTrackday and Competition Summer tire—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Continental

Winner: Continental ProContact GX SSR — better wet and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force R1 if treadwear, handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ProContact GX SSR scores 83 vs 30 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ProContact GX SSR scores 74 vs 30 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force R1 scores 80 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force R1 scores 100 vs 87 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force R1
Tire B · Continental ProContact GX SSR

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.