81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
85/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
88/100
29 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
29 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better noise, dry and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 86 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 91 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 89% | 92% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 91% | 87% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 96% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 95% | 88% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 89 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 100% | 96% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 76% | 78% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | 59 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 83 |
| Dry | 84 | 89 |
| Wet | 84 | 86 |
| Snow | 89 | 82 |
| Comfort | 85 | 85 |
| Noise | 50 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 89 |
| Handling | 85 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 90% #8/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 83% #7/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +6.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 97% #6/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | +1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #17/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 99% #4/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -1.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 94% #2/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -9.4 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 93% #5/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | +4.9 | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 89% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 97% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | -8.4 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 62% #2/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 68% #3/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | -6 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #4/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #2/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | -0.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 77% #5/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 92% #9/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -15.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 81% #12/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #20/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -18.6 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 86% #12/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 73% #17/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +12.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 14% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -85.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 99% #5/30 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | 100% #4/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 100% #1/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 96% #4/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +4.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 99% #2/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 97% #4/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 76% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 78% #18/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | -2.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 99% #4/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 94% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +4.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 91% #6/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #3/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -8.8 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 0% #7/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 92% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | -3.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 91% #12/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 87% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | +3.5 | Same test |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% #16/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 98% #5/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | -2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #11/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 88% #6/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is widely regarded as a premium, highly balanced winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions while offering exceptional comfort and low noise levels. Most users report high levels of confidence in varied winter weather, though a small minority of users report inconsistent performance in severe snow and ice, and some note that steering response is less sharp than dedicated performance-focused alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of cabin comfort and low road noise
- Strong, predictable grip on snow and slush
- Good balance of dry handling and rolling resistance
- Solid tread life and durability for a performance winter tire
Cons
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Steering feel can be perceived as 'soft' or 'jelly' compared to summer tires
- Performance can drop off in temperatures above 8-10°C
- Inconsistent feedback regarding extreme ice traction
Observations
- EV and hybrid owners frequently praise the tire for its low rolling resistance and quiet operation.
- Drivers of high-performance RWD vehicles report that while the tire provides excellent grip, it may feel less stiff and sharp during aggressive cornering compared to summer counterparts.
- Users on larger wheel diameters (20-inch) report that the tire maintains high comfort levels without sacrificing handling.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | B · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
BFGoodrich
83
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better noise, dry and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 59 vs 50 on noise.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 82 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 89 vs 84 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 85 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 also compared with
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.