81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
85/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
88/100
29 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
77/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better wet, snow and handling. Pick the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 if noise and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Winguard Snow G WH2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 73 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 89% | 84% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 96% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 82 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 99% | 94% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 100% | 95% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winguard Snow G WH2 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 74 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 79 |
| Dry | 84 | 88 |
| Wet | 84 | 69 |
| Snow | 89 | 77 |
| Comfort | 85 | 77 |
| Noise | 50 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 87 |
| Handling | 85 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 97% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 99% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -1.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 98% #10/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -12.8 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #13/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 99% #7/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -0.9 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 77% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 90% #3/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -13.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 13% #8/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 99% #8/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 94% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +5.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 100% #1/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 95% #9/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +5 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 84% #10/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +10.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% #10/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 84% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +4.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 96% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
The Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that offers impressive snow performance and comfort for its price point. While most users find it to be a reliable and cost-effective alternative to premium brands, opinions on wet-weather handling and noise levels are polarized, suggesting inconsistent performance across different driving styles and road conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong traction and confidence-inspiring grip in snow
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels for many users
- Good tread longevity and durability
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and slushy conditions
- Reports of increased road noise as the tire wears
- Handling can feel 'spongy' or lacking in steering precision
- Polarized feedback regarding wet-weather safety
Observations
- Users driving higher-horsepower vehicles, such as a 210 hp Honda Accord, reported that the tire remains stable and capable in varied conditions.
- Performance feedback is highly subjective, with some users noting significant noise increases after 10,000km, while others praise the quiet ride.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | B · Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
BFGoodrich
79
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better wet, snow and handling. Pick the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 if noise and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 scores 86 vs 50 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 84 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 77 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 74 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 also compared with
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.