Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 121 reviews
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 leads, 73–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,570 reviews
“I run Hakkapeliittas in the winter (UP of Michigan, 300"+ of snow per year) but I ran my KO2s last winter and they performed surprisingly well. They do struggle in ice and burnished snowpack, especially under 15F in my experience and since they have no siping they don't clear as well as snow tires. If it's KO2s vs. All Seasons I'd go with the KO2s, just know they still don't beat proper snow tires.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +174Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 76 76 -
77
Wet
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +473Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 79 73 -
70
Snow
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +474Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 69 76 -
70
Comfort
Level70Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 71 72 -
65
Noise
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +368Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 65 71 -
69
Treadwear
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +271Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 72 74 -
78
Handling
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +573Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online 78 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 72 |
| Dry | 73 | 74 |
| Wet | 77 | 73 |
| Snow | 70 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 70 |
| Noise | 65 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 71 |
| Handling | 78 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Pros
- Outstanding off-road and mud traction
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Impressive tread wear and longevity
Cons
- Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
Tire B All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities
Cons
- Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
- Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Community opinions on the BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A KO2 are deeply divided. Many users praise their exceptional sidewall durability, aggressive styling, long tread life, and reliable performance in dry dirt, sand, and light snow. Conversely, a significant number of drivers report issues with wet pavement traction, balancing difficulties, highway noise over time, and poor performance on ice or packed snow compared to dedicated winter tires.
“BFGoodrich KO2s are an excellent choice That is all. We got whacked with that big winter weather system here in Michigan last week. My '21 Sport is fitted with 235/75R15 KO2s and I finally got a feel for their cold/snow/ice performance characteristics. My opinion is favorable. They were good enough in 5-6" of loose powder, felt planted in melty slush, but mostly impressed me on glazed ice. Didn't encounter any hardpack snow, so can't really comment on how they'll do with that, but I expect they'll perform well on that surface also. I've been running at 38 psi, seems to work okay. Road noise is minimal. Fuel economy took a giant hit, though. I have no empirical measurements to back my observations, but it appears I've taken about an 8 MPG penalty. It only gets worse with speed, too. Highway miles eat even more gas than regular surface streets. Makes sense, given the nature of these tires. To be fair, however, I knew this would happen and accept the loss. For me and my goals with my Crosstrek build, the fuel economy loss is made up for with the improved grip under any road surface I've thrown at it yet. Just wanted to share my experience so far. I'm not disappointed. Read more”
“Nitto RidgeGrapplers… I had them for 4 years and had tons of tread left after 40000 miles until I got a new job where my truck stayed on that dark asphalt 10 hours a day and they started cracking but I had the 10ply tires as I used to pull a 16ft trailer with mowers all the time… my tires had several small nails in them but it never once had a flat somehow. They do good in the slick stuff although I had 4wd but I only ever drove on ice one time and they did better than I thought. I currently have KO2s… honestly not a fan simply because balancing them is a nightmare for some reason”
“I drove to the Deadhorse, Alaska (as far north as you can drive in America). The Dalton highway is a notorious 400 mile gravel road start just north of Fairbanks. Lots of people bring 2 spares. I had 0 flats. KO2 eat snow and sand for breakfast. They definitely improve my Q5 and allow me to hang with proper off-roaders (at least for a little while)”
Based on 88 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 | B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 27 | 16 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 18/32″ | 13 - 15/32″ |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 45 - 80 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Too close to call: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 and BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 is stronger on handling and wet. BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is stronger on snow and noise.
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 78 vs 73 on handling.
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 77 vs 73 on wet.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 74 vs 70 on snow.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 68 vs 65 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.