Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
73/100
38 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
67
Snow
81
Comfort
72
Noise
100
Treadwear
84
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
63
Wet
70
Snow
–
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
90
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 is stronger on dry. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 is stronger on comfort, treadwear and wet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 19
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
82
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
63
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 63

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM-80 leads by 3
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
67
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
70
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Professional tests (TWG score) 68 –
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 70

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
81
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
–
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Professional tests (TWG score) 80 –
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM-80 leads by 8
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
72
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
80
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
100
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
–
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM-80 leads by 6
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
84
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
90
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Tire Rack owners 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 84 90

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
72
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
70
Why this score
SourceAll Terrain TA KO2Blizzak LM-80
Tyre Reviews owners 72 70

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
Relative Score 75 76
Dry 82 63
Wet 67 70
Snow 81 –
Comfort 72 80
Noise 100 –
Treadwear 84 90
Handling 72 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
  • Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
  • Long tread life and high mileage capability
  • Aggressive, iconic visual appeal

Cons

  • Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
  • Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
  • Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow

Observations

  • Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
  • Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
Tire B Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 is highly regarded for its exceptional performance in cold, snowy, and icy conditions, while also demonstrating surprising versatility in milder weather. Users report a smooth, quiet ride and impressive durability, positioning it as a reliable choice for SUV and crossover owners.

Pros

  • Excellent traction on snow and ice
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong tread wear longevity
  • Effective performance in cold, wet conditions

Cons

  • Limited feedback on extreme high-speed dry handling
  • Potential for premature wear if used exclusively in high-heat summer conditions

Observations

  • Users transitioning from factory-fitted all-season tires on SUVs, such as the Ford Kuga, report a noticeable improvement in ride comfort and cold-weather grip.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires—
Sizes available16—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth13 - 15/32″—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Bridgestone

Too close to call: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 is stronger on dry. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 is stronger on comfort, treadwear and wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 scores 82 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 scores 80 vs 72 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 scores 90 vs 84 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 scores 70 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.