Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 77 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 91 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 84 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 72 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 74 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 63 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 59 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-80 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 76 |
| Dry | 63 | 84 |
| Wet | 70 | 88 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 80 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 59 |
| Handling | 70 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 is highly regarded for its exceptional performance in cold, snowy, and icy conditions, while also demonstrating surprising versatility in milder weather. Users report a smooth, quiet ride and impressive durability, positioning it as a reliable choice for SUV and crossover owners.
Pros
- Excellent traction on snow and ice
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong tread wear longevity
- Effective performance in cold, wet conditions
Cons
- Limited feedback on extreme high-speed dry handling
- Potential for premature wear if used exclusively in high-heat summer conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted all-season tires on SUVs, such as the Ford Kuga, report a noticeable improvement in ride comfort and cold-weather grip.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 11 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 is stronger on treadwear. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is stronger on dry, wet and handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 scores 90 vs 59 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 84 vs 63 on dry.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 88 vs 70 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 73 vs 70 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.